The Babylonian King List substantiates the ideas we find in the Sumerian King List. It also seems to be the antecedent of the list in Genesis chapter 5. We do not have the Babylonian King List in its original form; no cuneiform tablets have been discovered which compare with the Sumerian. But we do have fragments of the writings of Berossus, a Babylonian scholar who wrote his history of Babylonia in Greek in the third century B.C.E. While we do not have his original text, there are fragments quoted by later historians which reflect an authentic ancient tradition from which we can gather enough information to understand the ideas of the Babylonians which relate to the fifth chapter of Genesis.
According to the fragments of Berossus preserved in Eusebius’ Chronicle, 16 whose contents have been confirmed by discoveries in Babylonian Cuneiform tablets, the following is the list of the ante-diluvian kings of Babylon and their parallels or equivalents in the Sumerian King List and in the list of Genesis 5.
Berossus Babylonian Sumerian Genesis 5
Cuneiform King List
Aloros Aruru Alulim Adam
Alaparos Adapa Alalgar Seth
Awelu Awelu En-men-luanna Enosh
Ammenon Ummanu En-men-Galanna Kenan
Megalaros Dumuzi Mahalal-El
Daonos En-sipa-zianna Jared
Evendorachos En-men-duranki En-men-duranna Hanokh
Amempsinos Amel-Sin Ubar-Tutu Metushelah
Apartes Ubar-Tutu Lamech
Ksisouthros Ut-Napishtim Atrahasis Noah
In the story of the Flood, the surviving hero in Sumerian texts is either Atrahasis or Ziusudra. In the Babylonian Epic of Gilagmesh, it is Ut-Napishtim.17 But the tenth name in the list of Berossus seems to reflect either the name of Sumerian Ziusudra or Atrahasis or a fusion of both names. If Atra-hasis was read as Hasis-atra,18 then the Greek transliteration would surely have been a fusion of the two Sumerian names of the survivor of the Flood. [Hasis-Atra=Ksisouthros] In the biblical account it is Noah.
It should be apparent that there is a clear realtionship between the Babylonian King List as transmitted from Berossus, and the list of the patriarchs in Genesis 5. But there are differences, and these are significant, since the account in Genesis reflects a view of anthropology, of human origins which differs from that of the dominant view that we find in the Pagan world. It is, as is the account of human origins found in Genesis 2 and 3 a rejection of the views on human origins that we find in all of the religious expressions of the peoples of the ancient Near East other than the People of Israel.